CBJ
Central Bank of Jordan
Industries Regulated
Banking and lending, Regulated financial services
Region: Middle East
Jordan is strengthening financial-sector governance, cyber resilience and personal-data protection. Institutions need clear ownership, documented risk decisions, internal-control assurance and fast incident escalation across Central Bank and national requirements.
Middle East governance, risk and compliance intelligence
Central Bank of Jordan
Industries Regulated
Banking and lending, Regulated financial services
Jordan Securities Commission
Industries Regulated
Capital markets and listed companies
Ministry of Digital Economy and Entrepreneurship
Industries Regulated
Cross-sector data controllers and processors
The applicable perimeter depends on entity type, licence and sector. These priorities provide a practical starting point for programme design and evidence management.
01Each row translates an official regulatory source into an operational GRC focus, then identifies only the platforms with a defensible workflow or evidence role.
| Regulation and Authority | Applies To | Operational Focus | Platform Fit and Workflow Support | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate Governance Instructions for Banks No. 2 of 2023CBJ | Banks operating in Jordan | Board and committee governance, control functions, risk oversight, independence and accountability. |
Risk and control registers, assessments, appetite or limits, KRIs, treatments, approvals and board reporting. Risk-based assurance, control design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings and action follow-up. Policies and governance documents, approval and renewal workflows, compliance checklists and board reporting. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
View Source |
| Cybersecurity Framework for the Financial SectorCBJ | Financial institutions within CBJ scope | Cyber-risk governance, resilience capabilities, threat understanding, control evidence and sector response. |
Operational-risk registers, critical-service assessments, controls, KRIs, treatments and leadership reporting. Risk-based assurance, control testing, evidence, findings, approvals and remediation follow-up. Asset-centred cyber risk register, CIA-based assessments, control evidence, vulnerability exposure and accountable remediation. BoundaryGRC workflow and evidence support only. The platforms do not replace technical security monitoring, detection or protection tools. |
View Source |
| Jo-FinCERT Incident CoordinationCBJ | Financial and banking institutions | Cyber-incident response, threat coordination, escalation and sector resilience. |
Cyber-event intake, escalation, investigation, root cause, corrective action, recovery tracking and audit trail. Operational-risk registers, critical-service assessments, controls, KRIs, treatments and leadership reporting. Asset-centred cyber risk register, CIA-based assessments, control evidence, vulnerability exposure and accountable remediation. BoundaryGRC workflow and evidence support only. The platforms do not replace technical security monitoring, detection or protection tools. |
View Source |
| Personal Data Protection Law No. 24 of 2023MODEE | Data controllers processing personal data in Jordan | Data governance, controller responsibilities, data-subject rights, complaints and documented response to breaches. |
Incident intake, assessment, investigation, notification workflow, corrective action, escalation and closure evidence. Privacy risks, controls, assessments, treatment actions, ownership, approvals and management reporting. Obligation register, applicability, compliance assessments, observations, KCIs and retained evidence. BoundaryWorkflow and evidence support only. Applicability and legal interpretation remain with the organisation and its advisers. |
View Source |
This mapping is an implementation aid, not legal advice. It describes configurable workflow and evidence support, not automatic compliance. Always validate applicability, current versions, implementation dates and supervisory expectations with qualified advisers and the relevant authority.
Brochure-Validated Capability
The mapping uses the capabilities documented in the current brochures. It does not extend the platforms beyond their stated functional scope.

Best suited to enterprise risk ownership, risk and control registers, assessments, appetite and tolerances, KRIs, treatments, approvals, dashboards and board reporting.

Best suited to the audit universe, risk-based planning, engagement execution, RCM-linked design and effectiveness testing, evidence, findings, approvals and follow-up.

Best suited to incident intake, triage, investigation, root-cause analysis, escalation, notifications, corrective and preventive actions, closure and lessons learned.
Best suited to asset-centred cyber risk registers, confidentiality, integrity and availability assessments, control testing and evidence, vulnerability exposure and accountable remediation.

Best suited to policies, procedures and governance documents, approval and renewal workflows, compliance checklists, contract records and board reporting.
Best suited to authority documents and obligation registers, applicability, compliance assessments, observations, KCIs, regulatory updates and evidence retention.
The platforms support governance workflows, accountability, evidence and reporting. They do not calculate regulatory capital or liquidity, replace technical cybersecurity monitoring, provide legal interpretation, issue external-audit opinions or automatically file statutory notifications unless an approved integration and process are configured.
Use one traceable workflow to translate requirements, manage execution and demonstrate oversight.
01

